Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Sonographyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Sonography
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

The role of the inferior glenohumeral capsule ratio in the diagnosis of frozen shoulder/ adhesive capsulitis—An ultrasound study

Authors: Sumi Shrestha‐Taylor; Jillian L. Clarke; Ann Poulos; Mark Halaki; Karen Ginn;

The role of the inferior glenohumeral capsule ratio in the diagnosis of frozen shoulder/ adhesive capsulitis—An ultrasound study

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo investigate the role of the inferior glenohumeral capsule (IGHC) ratio in diagnosing frozen shoulder (FS) by analysing two patient groups with shoulder dysfunction, one with and the other without clinical signs of FS.MethodsThis study was performed in volunteers with unilateral shoulder problems. Passive ranges of motion were measured, and pre‐defined clinical criteria were used to allocate participants into FS and no‐FS groups. IGHC ratios were calculated at shoulder abduction angles of 60° and 90°. The Independent‐Samples‐Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the distributions of the IGHC ratios of the two groups.ResultsOf 151 participants (53 years ± 7, 78 men), 13 fulfilled the FS criteria. All participants were measured at 60° abduction. Eight of the FS and 127 of the no‐FS groups were able to be measured at 90°. A significant group difference was found in the IGHC ratios at 90° abduction (p = .008, FS group = 1.8, no‐FS group = 1.1) but not at 60° (p = .31). At 90° abduction, an IGHC ratio ≥1.8 was 92% specific to the FS cohort. In those without clinical signs of FS, no difference was found in IGHC thicknesses between the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides.ConclusionThe ultrasound IGHC thickness ratio obtained at 90° shoulder abduction has potential for confirming the clinical suspicion of FS in those who can abduct their shoulders to 90°. The contralateral shoulder used for comparison does not have to be symptom free as long as it does not exhibit clinical signs of FS.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
hybrid