
doi: 10.1002/sim.4477
pmid: 22302470
For genome‐wide association studies, we propose a new method for identifying significant biological pathways. In this approach, we aggregate data across single‐nucleotide polymorphisms to obtain summary measures at the gene level. We then use a hierarchical Bayesian model, which takes the gene‐level summary measures as data, in order to evaluate the relevance of each pathway to an outcome of interest (e.g., disease status). Although shifting the focus of analysis from individual genes to pathways has proven to improve the statistical power and provide more robust results, such methods tend to eliminate a large number of genes whose pathways are unknown. For these genes, we propose to use a Bayesian multinomial logit model to predict the associated pathways by using the genes with known pathways as the training data. Our hierarchical Bayesian model takes the uncertainty regarding the pathway predictions into account while assessing the significance of pathways. We apply our method to two independent studies on type 2 diabetes and show that the overlap between the results from the two studies is statistically significant. We also evaluate our approach on the basis of simulated data. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Models, Statistical, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Genetic Variation, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Bayes Theorem, Computer Simulation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study
Models, Statistical, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Genetic Variation, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Bayes Theorem, Computer Simulation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
