
pmid: 17566966
AbstractMeasurement of stimulus‐induced changes in activity in the brain is critical to the advancement of neuroscience. Scientists use a range of methods, including electrode implantation, surface (scalp) electrode placement, and optical imaging of intrinsic signals, to gather data capturing underlying signals of interest in the brain. These data are usually corrupted by artifacts, complicating interpretation of the signal; in the context of optical imaging, two primary sources of corruption are the heartbeat and respiration cycles. We introduce a new linear state‐space framework that uses the Kalman filter to remove these artifacts from optical imaging data. The method relies on a likelihood‐based analysis under the specification of a formal statistical model, and allows for corrections to the signal based on auxiliary measurements of quantities closely related to the sources of contamination, such as physiological processes. Furthermore, the likelihood‐based modeling framework allows us to perform both goodness‐of‐fit testing and formal hypothesis testing on parameters of interest. Working with data collected by our collaborators, we demonstrate the method of data collection in an optical imaging study of a cat's brain. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Brain Mapping, Models, Statistical, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Cats, Neurosciences, Animals, Brain, Probability theory, Photic Stimulation, United States, Statistics not elsewhere classified
Brain Mapping, Models, Statistical, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Cats, Neurosciences, Animals, Brain, Probability theory, Photic Stimulation, United States, Statistics not elsewhere classified
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
