
doi: 10.1002/sia.4894
handle: 20.500.14243/222058 , 2108/54924
Austenitic stainless steels are characterized by good corrosion resistance in different environments, but their use is limited because of low hardness and poor wear resistance. Conventional thermochemical surface treatments for improving the mechanical strength of steels induce Cr carbide precipitation and thus are detrimental to corrosion resistance. A low‐temperature (<470 °C) plasma treatment has been developed to overcome this problem and to reduce simultaneously the costs and the time of process. This paper reports the results of a microstructural characterization performed on a series of AISI 316L steel samples treated by plasma‐assisted low‐temperature carburization in different conditions. Microhardness tests and X‐ray diffraction indicated that the best results are achieved by employing a gas mixture with 2% of CH 4 in H 2 . XPS and AES were used to examine the chemical composition of the 20‐µm‐thick hardened layer. The results revealed that this layer is not homogeneous because a 2‐µm‐thick overlayer of graphitic nature forms on the surface. Furthermore, only the plasma treatment with 2% of CH 4 guarantees that the whole carbon remains in solid solution, whereas for higher CH 4 amounts in the gas mixture, carbide precipitation takes place. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
AES, XRD, Austenitic stainless steels, Low temperature carburization, Plasma treatments, AES, XPS, XRD, Settore ING-IND/21 - METALLURGIA, Plasma treatments, Low temperature carburization, austenitic stainless steel, Austenitic stainless steels, low-temperature carburization, plasma treatment, 669, XPS
AES, XRD, Austenitic stainless steels, Low temperature carburization, Plasma treatments, AES, XPS, XRD, Settore ING-IND/21 - METALLURGIA, Plasma treatments, Low temperature carburization, austenitic stainless steel, Austenitic stainless steels, low-temperature carburization, plasma treatment, 669, XPS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
