
doi: 10.1002/sec.1733
AbstractIn lightweight cryptographic primitives, round functions with simple operations XOR, modular addition, and shift (or rotation) are widely used nowadays. Among these ciphers, TEA and XTEA are two famous lightweight block ciphers. At AFRICACRYPT 2012, Jiazhe Chen, Meiqin Wang, and Bart Preneel proposed a method to establish impossible differential distinguishers for TEA and XTEA. At FSE 2012, with similar approach, Andrey Bogdanov and Meiqin Wang identified zero correlation linear distinguishers for TEA and XTEA. We find similarities in these two kinds of distinguishers and then probe into the deeper relationship between them. In this paper, we extend the TEA and XTEA to a more general TEA family‐type ciphers and study the impossible differential distinguishers and zero correlation linear distinguishers for this kind of ciphers. More specifically, with the methods proposed in these two references earlier, firstly, we prove the longest lengths for impossible differential distinguishers and zero correlation linear distinguishers on TEA family‐type ciphers. Secondly, the number of longest impossible differential distinguishers and zero correlation linear distinguishers are calculated respectively. Then, the specific forms of their input and output differences (or linear masks) are given. Thirdly, a dual property is proposed to demonstrate the deeper relationship between these two kinds of distinguishers. Finally, we give some suggestions for algorithm designers on how to shorten these two kinds of distinguishers for TEA family‐type ciphers. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
