
doi: 10.1002/sca.21055
pmid: 22961698
SummaryA number of techniques have been proposed during the last three decades for noise variance and signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) estimation in digital images. While some methods have shown reliability and accuracy in SNR and noise variance estimations, other methods are dependent on the nature of the images and perform well on a limited number of image types. In this article, we prove the accuracy and the efficiency of the image noise cross‐correlation estimation model, vs. other existing estimators, when applied to different types of scanning electron microscope images. SCANNING 35: 205‐212, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
:Engineering::Mechanical engineering [DRNTU]
:Engineering::Mechanical engineering [DRNTU]
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
