
doi: 10.1002/sca.20231
pmid: 21506135
AbstractIn this report electrostatic force microscopy (EFM) is used to study different peptide self‐assembled structures such as tubes and particles. It is shown that not only geometrical information can be obtained using EFM, but also information about the composition of different structures. In particular we use EFM to investigate the structures of diphenylalanine peptide tubes, particles, and CSGAITIG peptide particles placed on pre‐fabricated SiO2 surfaces with a backgate. We show that the cavity in the peptide tubes could be due to the presence of water residues. Additionally we show that self‐assembled amyloid peptides form spherical solid structures containing the same self‐assembled peptide in its interior. In both cases transmission electron microscopy is used to verify these structures. Further, the limitations of the EFM technique are discussed, especially when the observed structures become small compared with the radius of the AFM tip used. Finally, an agreement between the detected signal and the structure of the hollow peptide tubes is demonstrated. SCANNING 33: 201–207, 2011. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Nanotubes, Peptide, Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated, Propanols, Phenylalanine, Static Electricity, Water, Dipeptides, Microscopy, Atomic Force, Silicon Dioxide, Adenoviridae, Solutions, Viral Proteins, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Peptides
Nanotubes, Peptide, Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated, Propanols, Phenylalanine, Static Electricity, Water, Dipeptides, Microscopy, Atomic Force, Silicon Dioxide, Adenoviridae, Solutions, Viral Proteins, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Peptides
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
