
AbstractAlgorithmic fairness seeks to identify and correct sources of bias in machine learning algorithms. Confoundingly, ensuring fairness often comes at the cost of accuracy. We provide formal tools in this work for reconciling this fundamental tension in algorithm fairness. Specifically, we put to use the concept of Pareto optimality from multiobjective optimization and seek the fairness‐accuracy Pareto front of a neural network classifier. We demonstrate that many existing algorithmic fairness methods are performing the so‐called linear scalarization scheme, which has severe limitations in recovering Pareto optimal solutions. We instead apply the Chebyshev scalarization scheme which is provably superior theoretically and no more computationally burdensome at recovering Pareto optimal solutions compared to the linear scheme.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Statistics - Machine Learning, Machine Learning (stat.ML), 004, Machine Learning (cs.LG)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Statistics - Machine Learning, Machine Learning (stat.ML), 004, Machine Learning (cs.LG)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
