
doi: 10.1002/rsa.20218
AbstractThe Johnson–Lindenstrauss lemma asserts that an n‐point set in any Euclidean space can be mapped to a Euclidean space of dimension k = O(ε‐2 log n) so that all distances are preserved up to a multiplicative factor between 1 − ε and 1 + ε. Known proofs obtain such a mapping as a linear map Rn → Rk with a suitable random matrix. We give a simple and self‐contained proof of a version of the Johnson–Lindenstrauss lemma that subsumes a basic versions by Indyk and Motwani and a version more suitable for efficient computations due to Achlioptas. (Another proof of this result, slightly different but in a similar spirit, was given independently by Indyk and Naor.) An even more general result was established by Klartag and Mendelson using considerably heavier machinery.Recently, Ailon and Chazelle showed, roughly speaking, that a good mapping can also be obtained by composing a suitable Fourier transform with a linear mapping that has a sparse random matrix M; a mapping of this form can be evaluated very fast. In their result, the nonzero entries of M are normally distributed. We show that the nonzero entries can be chosen as random ± 1, which further speeds up the computation. We also discuss the case of embeddings into Rk with the ℓ1 norm. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 2008
low-distortion embeddings, dimension reduction, subgaussian tail, Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity, Euclidean geometries (general) and generalizations, moment generating function, Analysis of algorithms, General theory of distance geometry, Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma
low-distortion embeddings, dimension reduction, subgaussian tail, Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity, Euclidean geometries (general) and generalizations, moment generating function, Analysis of algorithms, General theory of distance geometry, Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 140 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
