
doi: 10.1002/rnc.887
handle: 1959.13/26681
AbstractThis contribution addresses the problem of discrete time receding horizon quadratic control for plants whose input is restricted to belong to a finite set. We also study the dynamics of the resulting closed‐loop system. Based upon the geometry of the underlying quadratic programme, a finitely parametrized expression for the control law is derived, which makes use of vector quantizers. Alternatively, the control law can be formulated by means of a polyhedral partition of the state space, which is closely connected with the partition induced when considering saturation‐like constraints. Exact analytic expressions for the partition can be developed, therefore avoiding the need for on‐line optimization. The closed‐loop system, comprising controller and plant, exhibits highly nonlinear dynamics, due to the finite set restriction. Asymptotic stability only holds for very special cases. In general, this notion is too strong. Nevertheless, ultimate boundedness of state trajectories is often achieved. Tools for determining positively invariant sets, hence ensuring ultimate boundedness, are presented. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Ultimate boundedness, finite sets, ultimate boundedness, closed-form solution, invariant sets, 531, quantized controls, Constrained control, 510, 620, Discrete-time control/observation systems, Design techniques (robust design, computer-aided design, etc.), polyhedral partition, Receding horizon, constrained control, Predictive control, receding horizon, predictive control, Finite sets
Ultimate boundedness, finite sets, ultimate boundedness, closed-form solution, invariant sets, 531, quantized controls, Constrained control, 510, 620, Discrete-time control/observation systems, Design techniques (robust design, computer-aided design, etc.), polyhedral partition, Receding horizon, constrained control, Predictive control, receding horizon, predictive control, Finite sets
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 123 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
