
AbstractWe study the application of a data‐enabled predictive control (DeePC) algorithm for position control of real‐world nano‐quadcopters. The DeePC algorithm is a finite‐horizon, optimal control method that uses input/output measurements from the system to predict future trajectories without the need for system identification or state estimation. The algorithm predicts future trajectories of the quadcopter by linearly combining previously measured trajectories (motion primitives). We illustrate the necessity of a regularized variant of the DeePC algorithm to handle the nonlinear nature of the real‐world quadcopter dynamics with noisy measurements. Simulation‐based analysis is used to gain insights into the effects of regularization, and experimental results validate that these insights carry over to the real‐world quadcopter. Moreover, we demonstrate the reliability of the DeePC algorithm by collecting a new set of input/output measurements for every real‐world experiment performed. The performance of the DeePC algorithm is compared to Model Predictive Control based on a first‐principles model of the quadcopter. The results are demonstrated with a video of successful trajectory tracking of the real‐world quadcopter.
Special Issue Articles, Data-driven control, quadcopters, Automated systems (robots, etc.) in control theory, Model predictive control, Predictive control, Quadcopters, Data-driven control; Predictive control; Quadcopters, data-driven control, predictive control, 004
Special Issue Articles, Data-driven control, quadcopters, Automated systems (robots, etc.) in control theory, Model predictive control, Predictive control, Quadcopters, Data-driven control; Predictive control; Quadcopters, data-driven control, predictive control, 004
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 81 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
