
doi: 10.1002/rnc.3908
SummaryIn the framework of quantitative feedback theory, this paper develops a new method to compute robust stability bounds. This is of special interest when stability is defined directly on the open‐loop function. Thus, ignorance of the plant gain and phase shift can be specifically and independently considered. Furthermore, upper and lower stability margins for both gain and phase can be chosen. However, classical quantitative feedback theory stability specifications are defined as constraining the peak magnitude of closed‐loop functions, which lack the said flexibility. Once the upper tolerance has been defined, all stability margins are determined. Moreover, confining the most restrictive stability margin may result in other excessive margins. However, the stability bounds of the new approach guard just the required distance from the open‐loop frequency response to the critical point. This allows maximization of the available feedback in the functional bandwidth and minimization of the cost of feedback beyond the crossover frequency, provided that the open‐loop frequency response is shaped to closely follow the stability bounds. It should be noted that the new bound computation algorithm performs few and simple arithmetic operations. This makes it far more efficient than traditional methods. The flight altitude control of an unmanned aerial vehicle is proposed as a practical example to show the new method's potential benefits.
stability margins, quantitative feedback theory, robust stability, bound computation, Feedback control, Robust stability, Frequency-response methods in control theory, robust control
stability margins, quantitative feedback theory, robust stability, bound computation, Feedback control, Robust stability, Frequency-response methods in control theory, robust control
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
