
doi: 10.1002/rnc.3782
handle: 11311/1023974
SummaryIn direct data‐driven controller tuning, a mathematical model of the plant is not needed, as the control law is directly derived from experimental data. Because the most widely used data‐driven techniques are based on the assumption that the underlying dynamics – albeit unknow – is linear, the performance of the resulting controller may not be acceptable with systems whose operating region vary along the time. In this paper, we discuss how to robustify linear data‐driven design by exploiting the features of scenario optimization. More specifically, we carry out a modified version of the well known virtual reference feedback tuning approach where probabilistic performance guarantees are given also when the current operating condition is different from the one observed in the controller identification experiment. We validate the proposed approach on a vehicle stability control problem, via a thorough simulation campaign on a multibody simulator. The experimental results show the effectiveness of the proposed approach in a complex real‐world setting. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Stability of control systems, Linear systems in control theory, Application models in control theory, virtual reference feedback tuning, Sensitivity (robustness), Feedback control, vehicle stability, robust control, data-driven control, Data-driven control; Robust; Vehicle stability; Virtual reference feedback tuning; Control and Systems Engineering; Chemical Engineering (all); Biomedical Engineering; Aerospace Engineering; Mechanical Engineering; Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering; Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Stability of control systems, Linear systems in control theory, Application models in control theory, virtual reference feedback tuning, Sensitivity (robustness), Feedback control, vehicle stability, robust control, data-driven control, Data-driven control; Robust; Vehicle stability; Virtual reference feedback tuning; Control and Systems Engineering; Chemical Engineering (all); Biomedical Engineering; Aerospace Engineering; Mechanical Engineering; Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering; Electrical and Electronic Engineering
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
