
SummaryThis paper proposes a non‐iterative direct approach for controller design from experimental data; the parameters of a controller of a prescribed order and structure are optimized with respect to a relevant performance criterion. The proposed design method enjoys the following features: (i) It does not involve the identification of the process to be controlled; (ii) it only requires a single experiment; (iii) in the case of stable plants, no initial controller is needed even when the process to be controlled is non‐minimum phase; and (iv) it provides sufficient conditions for the resulting closed‐loop system to be stable. The approach builds upon the so‐called unfalsified control theory; this key point makes it possible to derive simple and intuitive relations between the choice of the performance criterion to be optimized and closed‐loop stability conditions. The analysis is supported by numerical examples. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
data-driven optimization, ADAPTIVE SWITCHING CONTROL, STABILITY, Software, source code, etc. for problems pertaining to systems and control theory, MEMORY, control design, Control design; Data-driven optimization; Unfalsified control; Control and Systems Engineering;, PERFORMANCE, control design; data-driven optimization; unfalsified control, Discrete-time control/observation systems, Design techniques (robust design, computer-aided design, etc.), FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS, FLEXIBLE TRANSMISSION-SYSTEM, unfalsified control
data-driven optimization, ADAPTIVE SWITCHING CONTROL, STABILITY, Software, source code, etc. for problems pertaining to systems and control theory, MEMORY, control design, Control design; Data-driven optimization; Unfalsified control; Control and Systems Engineering;, PERFORMANCE, control design; data-driven optimization; unfalsified control, Discrete-time control/observation systems, Design techniques (robust design, computer-aided design, etc.), FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS, FLEXIBLE TRANSMISSION-SYSTEM, unfalsified control
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
