
doi: 10.1002/rcs.207
pmid: 18727138
AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the emerging role of robotic‐assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) in the management of bladder cancer.MethodsReview of the published literature on robotic‐assisted radical cystectomy, including data from our cystectomy series of 30 patients.ResultsNearly 150 procedures have been performed worldwide. The benefits of robotic‐assisted operations are similar to those of laparoscopically‐performed procedures. RARC appears to be technically safe, oncologically and functionally equivalent to open (ORC) and laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC). However, RARC offers superior ergonomics and better vision. These benefits come at extra initial capital expenditure and subsequent higher maintenance costs.ConclusionWith the rapid spread of robotics, it is likely that RARC will become the standard of care in units with access to the technology. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Treatment Outcome, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, 610, Humans, Equipment Design, Robotics, Cystectomy, 620
Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Treatment Outcome, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, 610, Humans, Equipment Design, Robotics, Cystectomy, 620
| citations The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest. | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
