
doi: 10.1002/rcs.1424
pmid: 22374864
AbstractBackgroundThe purpose of this study is to present a new navigation device for deformity correction surgery and to evaluate its accuracy compared with a conventional electromagnetic navigation system in tracking the orientation of synthetic bony fragments.MethodsThis system consists of three sensors and software which can be installed on any personal computer. One sensor is mounted about 1 m above the other sensors. The remaining two sensors are fixed to the bone fragments using Schanz screws. Data from all three sensors are computed using the software to estimate the change in position of the sensors. For the first part of the study 118 planned one and two plane deformities in 5° increments were created. For the second part of the study complex random 3‐dimensional deformities were created (300 valid measurements).ResultsThe mean absolute differences between measurements of the electromagnetic and mini‐navigator were 1.8 ± 1.9° in the coronal, 1.1 ± 1.1° in the sagittal and 0.8 ± 0.7° in the transverse plane. Absolute differences between mini‐navigator and Fastrak measurements were significantly affected by the magnitude of the deformity (P < 0.0001) with better accuracy for lower deformities.ConclusionsWe believe that this new technology is appealing, because of its high accuracy and lower planned costs compared with conventional navigation devices. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Equipment Design, Electromagnetic Phenomena, Software, Lower Extremity Deformities, Congenital
Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Equipment Design, Electromagnetic Phenomena, Software, Lower Extremity Deformities, Congenital
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
