
doi: 10.1002/rcm.4084
pmid: 19449321
Abstract We developed a concept for analysing carbon and nitrogen fluxes in microbial communities by employing protein‐based stable isotope probing (Protein‐SIP) in metabolic labelling experiments with stable isotope labelled substrates. For identification of microbial species intact protein profiling (IPP) can be used, whereas the assessment of their metabolic activity is achieved by shotgun mass mapping (SMM). Microbial cultures were grown on substrates containing 13 C or 15 N. For identification of species we tested both the IPP and the SMM approaches. Mass spectra (MALDI‐MS) were taken from mixtures of either intact proteins or peptides from tryptic digestion for generating species‐specific peak patterns. In the case of SMM, the fragmentation of peptides was additionally used to obtain sequence information for species identification. Mass spectra of peptide sequences allow calculation of the amount of 13 C or 15 N incorporation within peptides for determining metabolic activity of the specific species. The comparison of IPP and SMM revealed a higher robustness of species identification by SMM. In addition, the assessment of incorporation levels of 13 C and 15 N into peptides by SMM revealed a lower uncertainty (0.5–0.8 atom %) compared to IPP (6.4–8.9 atom %). The determination of metabolic activity and function of individual species by Protein‐SIP can help to analyse carbon and nitrogen fluxes within microbial communities. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Carbon Isotopes, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Bacterial Proteins, Nitrogen Isotopes, Pseudomonas putida
Carbon Isotopes, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Bacterial Proteins, Nitrogen Isotopes, Pseudomonas putida
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
