Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Quarterly Journal of...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Flux‐gradient relations and their dependence on turbulence anisotropy

Authors: Mosso, Samuele; Calaf, Marc; Stiperski, Ivana;

Flux‐gradient relations and their dependence on turbulence anisotropy

Abstract

AbstractMonin–Obukhov similarity theory (MOST) is used in virtually all Earth System Models to parametrize the near‐surface turbulent exchanges and mean variable profiles. Despite its widespread use, there is high uncertainty in the literature about the appropriate parametrizations to use. In addition, MOST has limitations in very stable and unstable regimes, over heterogeneous terrain and complex orography, and has been found to represent the surface fluxes incorrectly. A new approach including turbulence anisotropy as a non‐dimensional scaling parameter has recently been developed and has been shown to overcome these limitations and generalize the flux‐variance relations to complex terrain. In this article, we analyze the flux‐gradient relations for five well‐known datasets, ranging from flat and homogeneous to slightly complex terrain. The scaling relations show substantial scatter and highlight the uncertainty in the choice of parametrization even over canonical conditions. We show that, by including information on turbulence anisotropy as an additional scaling parameter, the original scatter becomes well bounded and new formulations can be developed that drastically improve the accuracy of the flux‐gradient relations for wind shear () in unstable conditions and for temperature gradient () in both unstable and stable regimes. This analysis shows that both and are strongly dependent on turbulence anisotropy and allows us finally to settle the extensively discussed free convection regime for , which clearly exhibits a power law when anisotropy is accounted for. Furthermore, we show that the eddy diffusivities for momentum and heat and the turbulent Prandtl number are strongly dependent on anisotropy and that the latter goes to zero in the free convection limit. These results highlight the necessity to include anisotropy in the study of near‐surface atmospheric turbulence and lead the way for theoretically more robust simulations of the boundary layer over complex terrain.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
hybrid