
AbstractArthritis and other rheumatic conditions (AORC) are the leading cause of disability, are associated with poor quality of life and incur considerable direct and indirect costs. It is considered that the instance of AORC will continue to increase. To assess the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of Harpagophytum (Bioforce) in the treatment of AORC, a single group open study of 8 weeks duration (259 patients) was performed in the United Kingdom. Effectiveness was assessed by numeric rating scales, the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index and the Algofunctional Hand Osteoarthritis Index. Tolerance was measured by a numeric rating scale and safety by self‐reporting, blood analysis and liver function tests. Quality of life was measured by SF‐12 questionnaire. There were statistically significant (p < 0.0001) improvements in patient assessment of global pain, stiffness and function. There were also statistically significant reductions in mean pain scores for hand, wrist, elbow, shoulder, hip, knee and back pain. Quality of life measurements (SF‐12) were significantly increased from baseline and 60% patients either reduced or stopped concomitant pain medication. Harpagophytum is an effective and well‐tolerated serious treatment option for mild to moderate degenerative rheumatic disorders providing improved quality of life measure. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Male, Joint pain, General rheumatic disorders, Plant Extracts, Middle Aged, Blood Cell Count, Liver Function Tests, Patient Satisfaction, Rheumatic Diseases, 616, Harpagophytum, Humans, Patient Compliance, Female, Joint Diseases, Devil's Claw, Aged
Male, Joint pain, General rheumatic disorders, Plant Extracts, Middle Aged, Blood Cell Count, Liver Function Tests, Patient Satisfaction, Rheumatic Diseases, 616, Harpagophytum, Humans, Patient Compliance, Female, Joint Diseases, Devil's Claw, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
