
AbstractThe antioxidant activity of Melissa officinalis subsp. officinalis and of Melissa officinalis subsp. inodora extracts, obtained by using carbon dioxide under supercritical conditions was investigated. The samples were prepared in two steps. A preliminary extraction at 90 bar and 50 °C eliminated the essential oil, then a further extraction at 300 bar and 50 °C obtained the high molecular mass extract. These samples were tested for autoxidation and the iron or EDTA‐mediated oxidation of linoleic acid at 37 °C in the absence of solvent, in in vitro systems. During linoleic acid autoxidation and its EDTA‐mediated oxidation both M. officinalis and M. inodora extracts showed an antioxidant activity, and no significant differences in their efficacy were observed. None showed any prooxidant activity. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Plant Extracts, Chromatography, Supercritical Fluid, Melissa, Antioxidants, Linoleic Acid, Plant Leaves, Inhibitory Concentration 50, Humans, Edetic Acid, Phytotherapy
Plant Extracts, Chromatography, Supercritical Fluid, Melissa, Antioxidants, Linoleic Acid, Plant Leaves, Inhibitory Concentration 50, Humans, Edetic Acid, Phytotherapy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 53 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
