
The analysis of auxetic structural elements undergoing transverse shear deformation has so far been largely confined to the first‐order shear deformation theory (FSDT), which requires a shear correction factor; analysis using the third‐order shear deformation theory (TSDT), which does not require a shear correction factor, is currently lacking in regard to auxetic structural elements. This paper adopts the TSDT to evaluate the elastic stability of isotropic columns with special emphasis on auxetic ones for pinned–pinned columns with springs of equal rotational stiffness at both ends. Results on columns with pinned–pinned (zero stiffness) and fixed–fixed (infinite stiffness) end conditions with square and circular cross sections reveal that auxeticity (i) reduces the transverse shear deformation, (ii) allows the use of classical theories, and (iii) provides higher elastic stability.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
