
doi: 10.1002/psc.2773
pmid: 25858776
Fusion of lipid membranes to form a single bilayer is an essential process for life and provides important biological functions including neurotransmitter release. Membrane fusion proteins facilitate approximation of interacting membranes to overcome the energy barrier. In case of synaptic transmission, proteins involved are known as soluble N‐ethylmaleimide‐sensitive‐factor attachment receptor (SNARE) proteins. The SNAREs from synaptic vesicles interact with the SNAREs from the target membrane to form a coiled‐coil bundle of four helices, thus pulling the membranes tightly together and initiating fusion. However, it remains unclear how these proteins function at molecular level. Natural systems are often too complex to obtain unambiguous results. Simple model systems mimicking natural proteins in synthetic lipid bilayers are powerful tools for obtaining insights into this essential biological process. An important advantage of such systems is their well‐defined composition, which can be systematically varied in order to fully understand events at molecular level. In this review, selected model systems are presented based upon specific interactions between recognition units embedded in separate lipid bilayers mimicking native SNARE protein‐mediated membrane fusion. Copyright © 2015 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Models, Molecular, Lipid Bilayers, History, 21st Century, Membrane Fusion, Models, Biological, Synaptic Transmission, Protein Structure, Secondary, Biomimetics, Humans, Synaptic Vesicles, SNARE Proteins
Models, Molecular, Lipid Bilayers, History, 21st Century, Membrane Fusion, Models, Biological, Synaptic Transmission, Protein Structure, Secondary, Biomimetics, Humans, Synaptic Vesicles, SNARE Proteins
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
