Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Pest Management Scie...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Pest Management Science
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Development of a nanoemulsion bioherbicide and its herbicidal efficacy

Authors: Mahmudul Hasan; Anis Syahirah Mokhtar; Mst. Motmainna; Muhammad Saiful Ahmad‐Hamdani;

Development of a nanoemulsion bioherbicide and its herbicidal efficacy

Abstract

AbstractBACKGROUNDBioherbicide applications are environmental‐friendly approaches to control weeds toward sustainable agriculture. Hence, the current research focused on developing a ready‐to‐use nanoemulsion bioherbicide from the current less economical WeedLock bioherbicide, furthermore evaluating its weed control efficacy. Nanoemulsion composition comprised 2‐undecanone (active ingredient), Termul 5030, POE(20)SMO, and water. The selected formulations were incorporated with 5% active ingredient.RESULTSAmong the 11 formulations tested, three formulations (WLRF7, WLRF9, and WLRF11) showed remarkable stability, in centrifugation, storage stability, and thermostability. Furthermore, screening for weed control efficacy on Ageratum conyzoides L., Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. and Cyperus iria L. at 1345.50 L ha−1 (WeedLock recommended rate) WLRF9 formulation exhibited a greater efficacy of 98.39% than WLRF7 (83.90%) and WLRF11 (91.31%). In the dose–response experiment, at the recommended rate, 98.16%, 98.25%, and 98.38% control efficacy were produced by the WLRF9 formulation, glufosinate‐ammonium, and glyphosate isopropyl‐amine, respectively.CONCLUSIONEvidently, the new bioherbicide formulation (WLRF9) has shown excellent efficacy and potential to control weeds. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Herbicides, Weed Control, Plant Weeds, Emulsions, Cyperus, Eleusine

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!