Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Pest Management Scie...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Pest Management Science
Article
License: publisher-specific, author manuscript
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Pest Management Science
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Decreased Cry1Ac activation by midgut proteases associated with Cry1Ac resistance in Helicoverpa zea

Authors: Min Zhang; Jizhen Wei; Xinzhi Ni; Jie Zhang; Juan L Jurat‐Fuentes; Jeffrey A Fabrick; Yves Carrière; +2 Authors

Decreased Cry1Ac activation by midgut proteases associated with Cry1Ac resistance in Helicoverpa zea

Abstract

AbstractBACKGROUNDField‐evolved resistance of Helicoverpa zea to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin Cry1Ac was first reported more than a decade ago, yet the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Towards understanding the mechanisms of resistance to Cry1Ac, we analyzed a susceptible (LAB‐S) and two resistant (GA and GA‐R) strains of H. zea. The GA strain was derived from Georgia and exposed to Bt toxins only in the field. The GA‐R strain was derived from the GA strain and selected for increased resistance to Cry1Ac in the laboratory.RESULTSResistance to MVPII, a liquid formulation containing a hybrid protoxin similar to Cry1Ac, was 110‐fold for GA‐R and 7.8‐fold for GA relative to LAB‐S. In midgut brush border membrane vesicles, activity of alkaline phosphatase and aminopeptidase N did not vary significantly among strains. The activity of total proteases, trypsin‐like proteases and chymotrypsin‐like proteases was significantly lower for GA‐R and GA than LAB‐S, but did not differ between GA‐R and GA. When H. zea midgut cells were exposed to Cry1Ac protoxin that had been digested with midgut extracts, toxicity was significantly lower for extracts from GA‐R and GA relative to extracts from LAB‐S, but did not differ between GA‐R and GA. Transcriptional analysis showed that none of the five protease genes examined was associated with the decline in Cry1Ac activation in GA‐R and GA relative to LAB‐S.CONCLUSIONThe results suggest that decreased Cry1Ac activation is a contributing field‐selected mechanism of resistance that helps explain the reduced susceptibility of the GA‐R and GA strains. Relative to the LAB‐S strain, the two Cry1Ac‐resistant strains had lower total protease, trypsin and chymotrypsin activities, a lower Cry1Ac activation rate, and Cry1Ac protoxin incubated with their midgut extracts was less toxic to H. zea midgut cells. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

Related Organizations
Keywords

Insecticides, Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins, Bacillus thuringiensis, Moths, Endotoxins, Gastrointestinal Tract, Insecticide Resistance, Hemolysin Proteins, Bacterial Proteins, Larva, Animals, Insect Proteins, Peptide Hydrolases

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    34
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
34
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
hybrid