
doi: 10.1002/ps.3589
pmid: 23749439
AbstractBACKGROUNDTraps suitable for catching female Agriotes click beetles may provide better reconnaissance than pheromone‐baited traps which catch only males, thereby contributing to more efficient crop protection. The basis for this study came from (i) observations of female Agriotes brevis (Candeze) aggregating beneath foliage of Medicago sativa (L.) and Lolium italicum (A. Br.) placed on plastic sheets on bare soil, and (ii) field tests demonstrating attraction of females to traps baited with foliage from these plants. The aim was to identify and field test volatile compounds from M. sativa and L. italicum leaves.RESULTSA number of electrophysiologically active chemicals were identified from headspace extracts of M. sativa and L. italicum. Three different synthetic blends of the identified compounds, comprising four, seven and nine components, were field tested. The four‐ and nine‐component blends caught more female A. brevis than unbaited traps, with the proportion of females not differing between blends.CONCLUSIONThe plant‐derived blends were shown to catch female A. brevis under field conditions when applied in traps. Of these, the four‐component blend, given its relatively simple composition [(Z)‐3‐hexenyl acetate:methyl benzoate:(Z)‐3‐hexen‐1‐ol:methyl salicylate 300:5:30:30 mg bait−1], may be a suitable ‘standard’ blend for bait optimisation. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry
Arthropod Antennae, Volatile Organic Compounds, Behavior, Animal, Acetates, Agronomy, Pheromones, Salicylates, Coleoptera, Plant Leaves, Italy, Lolium, Animals, Female, Hexanols, Entomology, Medicago sativa
Arthropod Antennae, Volatile Organic Compounds, Behavior, Animal, Acetates, Agronomy, Pheromones, Salicylates, Coleoptera, Plant Leaves, Italy, Lolium, Animals, Female, Hexanols, Entomology, Medicago sativa
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
