
doi: 10.1002/ps.3413
pmid: 23112103
AbstractBackgroundThe precise mode of action of sulfoxaflor, a new nicotinic acetylcholine receptor‐modulating insecticide, is unclear. A detailed understanding of the mode of action, especially in relation to the neonicotinoids, is essential for recommending effective pest management practices.ResultsRadiolabel binding experiments using a tritiated analogue of sulfoxaflor ([3H]‐methyl‐SFX) performed on membranes from Myzus persicae demonstrate that sulfoxaflor interacts specifically with the high‐affinity imidacloprid binding site present in a subpopulation of the total nAChR pool. In competition studies, imidacloprid‐like neonicotinoids displace [3H]‐methyl‐SFX at pM concentrations. The effects of sulfoxaflor on the exposed aphid nervous system in situ are analogous to those of imidacloprid and nitenpyram, and finally the high‐affinity sulfoxaflor binding site is absent in a Myzus persicae strain (clone FRC) possessing a single amino acid point mutation (R81T) in the β‐nAChR, a region critical for neonicotinoid interaction.ConclusionThe nicotinic acetylcholine receptor pharmacological profile of sulfoxaflor in aphids is consistent with that of imidacloprid. Additionally, the insecticidal activity of sulfoxaflor and the current commercialised neonicotinoids is affected by the point mutation in FRC Myzus persicae. Therefore, it is suggested that sulfoxalfor be considered a neonicotinoid, and that this be taken into account when recommending insecticide rotation partnering for effective resistance management programmes. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry
Insecticide Resistance, Insecticides, Sulfur Compounds, Pyridines, Aphids, Animals, Receptors, Nicotinic, Tritium, Binding, Competitive
Insecticide Resistance, Insecticides, Sulfur Compounds, Pyridines, Aphids, Animals, Receptors, Nicotinic, Tritium, Binding, Competitive
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 114 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
