Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Pest Management Scie...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Pest Management Science
Article . 2006 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comparison of efficacy, absorption and translocation of three glyphosate formulations on velvetleaf ( Abutilon theophrasti )

Authors: David, Belles; Dale, Shaner; Phil, Westra; Galen, Brunk;

Comparison of efficacy, absorption and translocation of three glyphosate formulations on velvetleaf ( Abutilon theophrasti )

Abstract

Abstract Growth analysis, absorption and translocation studies were conducted to compare a 1‐aminomethanamide dihydrogen tetraoxosulfate (GLY‐A) formulation of glyphosate with two isopropylamine (GLY‐IPA‐1, GLY‐IPA‐2) formulations of glyphosate on velvetleaf. The two isopropylamine formulations differed by the presence of a surfactant in the formulation, GLY‐IPA‐1 containing surfactant whereas GLY‐IPA‐2 did not. Four‐ to six‐leaf velvetleaf was treated with GLY‐A and GLY‐IPA‐1 and GLY‐IPA‐2 (0, 50, 67, 89, 119, 158, 280, 420, 560 and 840 g AE ha −1 ) with and without ammonium sulfate (AMS; 20 g L −1 ). GLY‐A and GLY‐IPA‐2 included a non‐ionic surfactant (2.5 mL L −1 ) in the spray solution at all herbicide concentrations. No additional surfactant was added to GLY‐IPA‐1. The IC 50 value for GLY‐A was 88 g AE ha −1 compared with 346 and 376 g AE ha −1 for GLY‐IPA‐1 and GLY‐IPA‐2 respectively in the absence of AMS. When AMS (20 g L −1 ) was added to the spray solution, the estimated IC 50 values were 143, 76 and 60 g AE ha −1 for GLY‐IPA‐1, GLY‐IPA‐2 and GLY‐A respectively. Absorption of 14 C‐glyphosate into the third leaf of five‐ to six‐leaf velvetleaf was three‐ to sixfold greater 72 h after treatment (HAT) when applied as GLY‐A compared with GLY‐IPA‐1 and GLY‐IPA‐2 respectively in the absence of AMS. AMS (20 g L −1 ) increased absorption of 14 C‐glyphosate in all glyphosate formulations two‐ to threefold, but differences among the formulations remained. Approximately three‐ and sixfold more 14 C‐glyphosate applied as GLY‐A had translocated out of the treated leaf compared with GLY‐IPA‐1 and GLY‐IPA‐2 respectively by 72 HAT. Adding AMS (20 g L −1 ) increased translocation of 14 C‐glyphosate out of the treated leaf approximately 2.5‐fold for all three formulations. The increased efficacy of GLY‐A versus GLY‐IPA‐1 and GLY‐IPA‐2 on velvetleaf is due to the greater rate of absorption and subsequent translocation of glyphosate out of the treated leaf. AMS increased the efficacy of all three formulations by increasing absorption and translocation of glyphosate in the plant. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry

Related Organizations
Keywords

Surface-Active Agents, Glyphosate, Herbicides, Glycine, Pesticide Synergists, Carbon Radioisotopes, Malvaceae, Absorption

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!