
doi: 10.1002/prs.11487
AbstractMany process hazard analyses (PHAs) provide insufficient detail to be able to perform layers of protection analysis (LOPA) studies properly using their results. LOPA teams experience difficulties, when PHA studies are performed without regard to the information needed for LOPA. The LOPA team must develop any needed information missing from the PHA. Not only does this require additional time and effort but it also detracts from performing LOPA. Furthermore, the LOPA results may be inaccurate, as the LOPA team may not develop hazard scenarios correctly. This article provides guidelines for PHA worksheet entries that help avoid these problems to ensure efficient and effective LOPA studies. © 2012 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog, 2012
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
