
doi: 10.1002/prs.10397
AbstractManagement of change (MOC) is one of the areas where metrics especially need to be developed. We can ensure quality of the MOC process by recognizing the elements that are crucial to making a good MOC and using a database to accomplish the mechanics, thus freeing personnel to concentrate on the important technical review requirements.We propose that a good MOC requires three elements to be well executed; the technical description of the change, the safety analysis (which includes its review), and the Pre‐Startup Safety Review. While striving to achieve quality, it is important to manage the process efficiently. This article discusses the requirements of high‐quality MOCs, the necessary workflow to have an efficient process, and the metrics that are necessary to do a good job in managing the MOC process. © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog, 2010
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
