
doi: 10.1002/prot.20933
pmid: 16508975
AbstractCorrelated mutations have been repeatedly exploited for intramolecular contact map prediction. Over the last decade these efforts yielded several methods for measuring correlated mutations. Nevertheless, the application of correlated mutations for the prediction of intermolecular interactions has not yet been explored. This gap is due to several obstacles, such as 3D complexes availability, paralog discrimination, and the availability of sequence pairs that are required for inter‐ but not intramolecular analyses. Here we selected for analysis fusion protein families that bypass some of these obstacles. We find that several correlated mutation measurements yield reasonable accuracy for intramolecular contact map prediction on the fusion dataset. However, the accuracy level drops sharply in intermolecular contacts prediction. This drop in accuracy does not occur always. In the Cohesin‐Dockerin family, reasonable accuracy is achieved in the prediction of both intra‐ and intermolecular contacts. The Cohesin‐Dockerin family is well suited for correlated mutation analysis. Because, however, this family constitutes a special case (it has radical mutations, has domain repeats, within each species each Dockerin domain interacts with each Cohesin domain, see below), the successful prediction in this family does not point to a general potential in using correlated mutations for predicting intermolecular contacts. Overall, the results of our study indicate that current methodologies of correlated mutations analysis are not suitable for large‐scale intermolecular contact prediction, and thus cannot assist in docking. With current measurements, sequence availability, sequence annotations, and underdeveloped sequence pairing methods, correlated mutations can yield reasonable accuracy only for a handful of families. Proteins 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Chemical Phenomena, Chemistry, Physical, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, Entropy, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Nuclear Proteins, Cell Cycle Proteins, Protein Subunits, Mutation, Amino Acids, Cohesins
Chemical Phenomena, Chemistry, Physical, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, Entropy, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Nuclear Proteins, Cell Cycle Proteins, Protein Subunits, Mutation, Amino Acids, Cohesins
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 96 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
