
doi: 10.1002/prot.20631
pmid: 16315289
AbstractOur previous results demonstrated that some essential, housekeeping proteins from pathogenic microorganisms may contain sizable insertions–deletions in their sequences (compared to close human homologs) that can be responsible for unexpected virulence properties. For example, we found that indel‐bearing elongation factor‐1α from several pathogenic protozoa can activate a human tyrosine phosphatase SHP‐1 leading to deactivation of macrophages. On the one hand, these findings allowed development of a strategy for targeting some indel‐containing pathogen proteins that have similar human counterparts. On the other hand, the results raised numerous questions regarding the nature and implications of sequence indels in pathogen proteins. In the present study, we conducted a large‐scale survey of indels in proteins from 136 bacterial and protozoan genomes. It has been established that sizable insertions and deletions occur in approximately 5–10% of bacterial proteins with close human homologs, while proteins from the protozoan pathogens such as Trypanosoma cruzi, Plasmodium falciparum, and Leishmania donovani exhibit elevated indel content that can reach up to 25%. The finding suggested that the occurrence of sequence indels may be involved in the evolution of pathogenic mechanisms in these protozoa. Proteins 2006. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Models, Molecular, Bacteria, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Protein Conformation, Protozoan Proteins, Eukaryota, Nuclear Proteins, Bacterial Proteins, Gene Frequency, Animals, Humans, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Deletion, Transcription Factors
Models, Molecular, Bacteria, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Protein Conformation, Protozoan Proteins, Eukaryota, Nuclear Proteins, Bacterial Proteins, Gene Frequency, Animals, Humans, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Deletion, Transcription Factors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
