
doi: 10.1002/prot.20099
pmid: 15146493
AbstractWe show that three‐dimensional signatures consisting of only a few functionally important residues can be diagnostic of membership in superfamilies of enzymes. Using the enolase superfamily as a model system, we demonstrate that such a signature, or template, can identify superfamily members in structural databases with high sensitivity and specificity. This is remarkable because superfamilies can be highly diverse, with members catalyzing many different overall reactions; the unifying principle can be a conserved partial reaction or chemical capability. Our definition of a superfamily thus hinges on the disposition of residues involved in a conserved function, rather than on fold similarity alone. A clear advantage of basing structure searches on such active site templates rather than on fold similarity is the specificity with which superfamilies with distinct functional characteristics can be identified within a large set of proteins with the same fold, such as the (β/α)8 barrels. Preliminary results are presented for an additional group of enzymes with a different fold, the haloacid dehalogenase superfamily, suggesting that this approach may be generally useful for assigning reading frames of unknown function to specific superfamilies and thereby allowing inference of some of their functional properties. Proteins 2004;9999:000–000. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Models, Molecular, Protein Folding, Binding Sites, Hydrolases, Structural Homology, Protein, Phosphopyruvate Hydratase, Protein Structure, Secondary, Enzymes
Models, Molecular, Protein Folding, Binding Sites, Hydrolases, Structural Homology, Protein, Phosphopyruvate Hydratase, Protein Structure, Secondary, Enzymes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
