Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The Prostatearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Prostate
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
The Prostate
Article . 2024
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine prostate cancer

Authors: Ivan de Kouchkovsky; Emily Chan; Charles Schloss; Christian Poehlein; Rahul Aggarwal;

Diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine prostate cancer

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAlthough most patients with prostate cancer (PC) respond to initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), castration‐resistant disease invariably develops. Progression to treatment‐emergent neuroendocrine PC (t‐NEPC) represents a unique mechanism of resistance to androgen receptor (AR)‐targeted therapy in which lineage plasticity and neuroendocrine differentiation induce a phenotypic switch from an AR‐driven adenocarcinoma to an AR‐independent NEPC. t‐NEPC is characterized by an aggressive clinical course, increased resistance to AR‐targeted therapies, and a poor overall prognosis.MethodsThis review provides an overview of our current knowledge of NEPC, with a focus on the unmet needs, diagnosis, and clinical management of t‐NEPC.ResultsEvidence extrapolated from the literature on small cell lung cancer or data from metastatic castration‐resistant PC (mCRPC) cohorts enriched for t‐NEPC suggests an increased sensitivity to platinum‐based chemotherapy. However, optimal strategies for managing t‐NEPC have not been established, and prospective clinical trial data are limited. Intertumoral heterogeneity within a given patient, as well as the lack of robust molecular or clinical biomarkers for early detection, often lead to delays in diagnosis and prolonged treatment with suboptimal strategies (i.e., conventional chemohormonal therapies for mCRPC), which may further contribute to poor outcomes.ConclusionsRecent advances in genomic and molecular classification of NEPC and the development of novel biomarkers may facilitate an early diagnosis, help to identify promising therapeutic targets, and improve the selection of patients most likely to benefit from NEPC‐targeted therapies.

Keywords

Male, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant, Humans, Prostatic Neoplasms, Androgen Antagonists, Prospective Studies, Adenocarcinoma, Biomarkers, Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
    45
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
45
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 1%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!