
AbstractNumerous short peptides have been shown to form β‐sheet amyloid aggregates in vitro. Proteins that contain such sequences are likely to be problematic for a cell, due to their potential to aggregate into toxic structures. We investigated the structures of 30 proteins containing 45 sequences known to form amyloid, to see how the proteins cope with the presence of these potentially toxic sequences, studying secondary structure, hydrogen‐bonding, solvent accessible surface area and hydrophobicity. We identified two mechanisms by which proteins avoid aggregation: Firstly, amyloidogenic sequences are often found within helices, despite their inherent preference to form β structure. Helices may offer a selective advantage, since in order to form amyloid the sequence will presumably have to first unfold and then refold into a β structure. Secondly, amyloidogenic sequences that are found in β structure are usually buried within the protein. Surface exposed amyloidogenic sequences are not tolerated in strands, presumably because they lead to protein aggregation via assembly of the amyloidogenic regions. The use of α‐helices, where amyloidogenic sequences are forced into helix, despite their intrinsic preference for β structure, is thus a widespread mechanism to avoid protein aggregation.
Models, Molecular, Solvent accessibility, Amyloid, Proteins, Hydrogen Bonding, Protein Structure, Secondary, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Aggregation, Secondary structure, Hydrogen-bond, Solvents, Animals, Humans, Amino Acid Sequence, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
Models, Molecular, Solvent accessibility, Amyloid, Proteins, Hydrogen Bonding, Protein Structure, Secondary, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Aggregation, Secondary structure, Hydrogen-bond, Solvents, Animals, Humans, Amino Acid Sequence, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 73 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
