
AbstractPurpose: Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an important cause of chronic liver injury that has gained concern in clinical hepatology. The principal aim of this study was to find differences in protein expression between patients with NAFLD and healthy controls.Experimental design: Changes in protein expression of liver samples from each of the three groups of subjects, controls, non‐alcoholic steatosis, and non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), were analyzed by DIGE combined with MALDI TOF/TOF analysis, a proteomic approach that allows to compare hundreds of proteins simultaneously.Results: Forty‐three proteins exhibiting significant changes (ratio ≥1.5, p<0.05) were characterized, 22 comparing steatosis samples versus control samples and 21 comparing NASH versus control samples. Ten of these proteins were further analyzed by Western blot in tissue samples to confirm the observed changes of protein expression using DIGE. The proteins validated were further tested in serum samples of different cohorts of patients.Conclusions and clinical relevance: Following this approach we identified two candidate markers, carbamoyl phosphate synthase 1 and 78 kDa glucose‐regulated protein, differentially expressed between control and NASH. This proteomics approach demonstrates that DIGE combined with MALDI TOF/TOF and Western blot analysis of tissue and serum samples is a useful approach to identify candidate markers associated with NAFLD, resulting in proteins whose level of expression can be correlated to a disease state.
Adult, Male, Proteomics, Blotting, Western, Proteins, Middle Aged, Fatty Liver, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Humans, Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional, Female
Adult, Male, Proteomics, Blotting, Western, Proteins, Middle Aged, Fatty Liver, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Humans, Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 51 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
