
doi: 10.1002/pra2.438
AbstractLibraries and library consortia are adopting controlled digital lending (CDL) as a strategy, accelerated by the ongoing COVID‐19 pandemic, to facilitate equitable access to print collections. While advocates of CDL contend that digitize‐and‐lend practices reflect an incremental, technology‐assisted adjustment to traditional library circulation, lending, and resource‐sharing practices, opponents of CDL in the United States and Canada argue that the practice contravenes well‐established copyright protections. This paper discusses current controversies surrounding CDL, its potential promise and perils, and concludes that a reasonable, equitable, and forward‐looking application of copyright laws ought to insulate libraries and library consortia from exposure to liability for engaging in CDL.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
