Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Pediatric Pulmonolog...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Pediatric Pulmonology
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Beta‐lactam versus beta‐ lactam/macrolide therapy in pediatric outpatient pneumonia

Authors: Lilliam, Ambroggio; Matthew, Test; Joshua P, Metlay; Thomas R, Graf; Mary Ann, Blosky; Maurizio, Macaluso; Samir S, Shah;

Beta‐lactam versus beta‐ lactam/macrolide therapy in pediatric outpatient pneumonia

Abstract

SummaryObjectiveThe objective was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of beta‐lactam monotherapy and beta‐ lactam/macrolide combination therapy in the outpatient management of children with community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP).MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included children, ages 1–18 years, with CAP diagnosed between January 1, 2008 and January 31, 2010 during outpatient management in the Geisinger Health System. The primary exposure was receipt of beta‐lactam monotherapy or beta‐lactam/macrolide combination therapy. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as a follow‐up visit within 14 days of diagnosis resulting in a change in antibiotic therapy. Logistic regression within a propensity score‐ restricted cohort was used to estimate the likelihood of treatment failure.ResultsOf 717 children in the analytical cohort, 570 (79.4%) received beta‐lactam monotherapy and 147 (20.1%) received combination therapy. Of those who received combination therapy 58.2% of children were under 6 years of age. Treatment failure occurred in 55 (7.7%) children, including in 8.1% of monotherapy recipients, and 6.1% of combination therapy recipients. Treatment failure rates were highest in children 6–18 years receiving monotherapy (12.9%) and lowest in children 6–18 years receiving combination therapy (4.0%). Children 6–18 years of age who received combination therapy were less likely to fail treatment than those who received beta‐lactam monotherapy (propensity‐adjusted odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.28, 0.95).ConclusionChildren 6–18 years of age who received beta‐ lactam/macrolide combination therapy for CAP in the outpatient setting had lower odds of treatment failure compared with those who received beta‐lactam monotherapy. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51:541–548. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords

Male, Adolescent, Age Factors, Infant, beta-Lactams, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Community-Acquired Infections, Treatment Outcome, Child, Preschool, Outpatients, Pneumonia, Bacterial, Humans, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Macrolides, Treatment Failure, Child, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    25
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
25
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze