Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Pediatric Pulmonolog...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Pediatric Pulmonology
Article . 2007 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Cutoff value of lipid‐laden alveolar macrophages for diagnosing aspiration in infants and children

Authors: María E Y, Furuya; Verónica, Moreno-Córdova; Jorge L, Ramírez-Figueroa; Mario H, Vargas; Guillermo, Ramón-García; David H, Ramírez-San Juan;

Cutoff value of lipid‐laden alveolar macrophages for diagnosing aspiration in infants and children

Abstract

AbstractChronic passage of gastric and/or alimentary material into the airways is a frequent and difficult‐to‐diagnose condition. Because alveolar macrophages phagocytose aspirated material, it has been suggested that their identification is a useful diagnostic method. To know the usefulness of the lipid‐laden alveolar macrophages (LLAM) index as a diagnostic tool for aspiration, children from 1 month to 16 years of age were included in three groups: G‐I, children with pulmonary pathology and suspicion of aspiration by clinic or image evaluation; G‐II, with pulmonary pathology without suspicion of aspiration; and G‐III, without respiratory symptoms nor suspicion of aspiration. Bronchoalveolar lavage was obtained through bronchoscopy in G‐I and G‐II, and through endotracheal tube in G‐III, and the LLAM index (0–400) was determined. A total of 112 patients (41, 30, and 41 in G‐I to III, respectively) were studied. LLAM index (mean ± SEM) was highest in G‐I (233.2 ± 5.5), as compared with G‐II (187.8 ± 11.6, P < 0.05), and G‐III (108.5 ± 13.5, P < 0.001). However, notable overlap of LLAM values was observed between G‐I and G‐II, and between G‐II and G‐III. When patients from G‐I and G‐III were jointly analyzed, the area under the ROC curve for diagnosing aspiration was 0.92, with a best cutoff value of >165 (98.6% sensitivity, 78.0% specificity, 87.8% overall accuracy). LLAM index, with a cutoff value of >165 is a useful diagnostic test for aspiration when there is suspicion of this condition. However, due to its low specificity, it does not discriminate other causes of chronic lung disease. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007; 42:452–457. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords

Male, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Pneumonia, Aspiration, Bronchoalveolar Lavage, Lipids, Sensitivity and Specificity, Pneumonia, Lipid, ROC Curve, Child, Preschool, Macrophages, Alveolar, Intubation, Intratracheal, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Child, Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    46
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
46
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!