
doi: 10.1002/ppul.20276
pmid: 16155882
Our aim was to compare the effects of nasal bilevel positive airway pressure (N-BiPAP) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (N-CPAP) on gas exchange in preterm babies. Twenty preterm infants (mean gestational age, 26.3 weeks; mean weight at study, 1,033 g) were evaluated. Patients received two repeated cycles of N-CPAP alternated with N-BiPAP, for a total of four alternated phases, each phase lasting 1 hr. Transcutaneous PO2 (TcPO2), transcutaneous PCO2 (tcPCO2), pulsoximetry, and respiratory rate were recorded every 15 min. Arterial blood gases and acid-base balance were measured at the beginning of the first study period on baseline CPAP and at the end of the last study period on bilevel positive airway pressure. During the two N-BiPAP phases, a statistically significant (P < 0.001) increase of peripheral oxygen saturation and tcPO2, and a significant (P < 0.001) reduction of tcPCO2 and respiratory rate, were noted as compared to the two N-CPAP periods. In addition, a significant improvement of PO2 (P < 0.003) and a reduction of PCO2 were noted at the end of the test (P < 0.02). In conclusion, N-BiPAP, as compared to N-CPAP, improved gas exchange in preterm infants.
Male, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Cross-Over Studies, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Pulmonary Gas Exchange, Infant, Newborn, Carbon Dioxide, Oxygen, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Respiratory Mechanics, Humans, Female, Blood Gas Analysis, Infant, Premature
Male, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Cross-Over Studies, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Pulmonary Gas Exchange, Infant, Newborn, Carbon Dioxide, Oxygen, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Respiratory Mechanics, Humans, Female, Blood Gas Analysis, Infant, Premature
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 76 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
