Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Plants, People, Plan...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Plants, People, Planet
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
UQ eSpace
Article . 2026
Data sources: UQ eSpace
UQ eSpace
Article . 2026
Data sources: UQ eSpace
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Speciation with gene flow

Authors: Zhiqin Long; Xu Zhang; Yue Yu; Gregory L. Owens; Diana J. Rennison; Clarisse Palma‐Silva; Daniel Ortiz‐Barrientos; +1 Authors

Speciation with gene flow

Abstract

Societal Impact Statement Biodiversity is threatened by human activities, with extinction debt accumulating rapidly. Many of these activities change the connectivity of populations, fragmenting existing population systems or bringing previously isolated populations or species into contact. Speciation research offers insights into both the short‐ and long‐term outcomes of changes in isolation and connectivity and thus provides fundamental knowledge that can inform biodiversity management. Here, we review what is known about the role of gene flow in speciation, highlighting that gene flow does not appear to be a major impediment to speciation in plants and instead often contributes to diversification. Summary The likelihood of speciation with gene flow represents one of the longest running debates in evolutionary biology. Gene flow can hamper speciation by disrupting associations between loci under divergent natural selection and those causing assortative mating. Conversely, variation introduced by gene flow can facilitate speciation, and some modes of speciation require interspecific gene flow. Here, we first describe the history of this debate. Next, we review theoretical models of speciation with gene flow, along with empirical evidence, emphasizing studies of plants. Our review includes both primary divergence with gene flow, as well as gene flow following secondary contact, including different forms of hybrid speciation. We find that plants have several characteristics that can promote the formation of associations between ecological and assortative mating traits, including magic traits (divergently selected traits that also cause assortative mating) and abundant recombination suppressors, such as inversions. Biogeographic studies of several plant groups show patterns of greater range overlap and range asymmetry in sister species compared with more distantly related species. This pattern suggests that geographic isolation is not required for speciation in plants and also that speciation by budding may be important. Genomic data further indicate that gene flow is frequent, but often intermittent, during the speciation process in plants and that speciation triggered by secondary gene flow (introgression) is common. We conclude that Darwin's skepticism about the necessity of geographic isolation in speciation is warranted, especially in the plant kingdom.

Keywords

Sympatric Speciation, Reproductive Isolation, Ecological Speciation, Genomic Islands, 1107 Forestry, 1108 Horticulture, 1105 Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 1110 Plant Science, Local Adaptation, Divergence Hitchhiking, Adjacent Plant-Populations, Chromosomal Rearrangements, Hybrid Speciation, Mimulus-Guttatus

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
gold