
doi: 10.1002/pon.654
pmid: 12833556
AbstractThis study tested a model of adjustment to cancer in which social support, disease impact, and religious coping were hypothesized to have an impact on adjustment to cancer that was mediated by self‐efficacy. Two hundred and ninety‐two people with cancer completed questionnaires. Three analyses were undertaken: first, the structure of the Religious Problem Solving Scale was assessed by a factor analysis in which two factors emerged, Deferring–Collaborative and Self‐Directing; second, the resulting factors' relationships to outcome measures were assessed through correlational and regression analyses; third, a mediated model of coping was tested with self‐efficacy as a mediating variable between religious coping and adjustment. The Deferring–Collaborative factor had positive relationships with most of the variables and was partially mediated by self‐efficacy. The results indicate that religious coping has no relationship to quality of life, a positive relationship with adjustment, and was more important in this study than available social support. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Adult, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Religion and Medicine, Sick Role, Social Support, Middle Aged, Self Efficacy, Neoplasms, Sickness Impact Profile, Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Female, Internal-External Control, Problem Solving, Aged
Adult, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Religion and Medicine, Sick Role, Social Support, Middle Aged, Self Efficacy, Neoplasms, Sickness Impact Profile, Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Female, Internal-External Control, Problem Solving, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 75 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
