Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Psycho-Oncologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Psycho-Oncology
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Psycho-Oncology
Article . 2013
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Mental adjustment at different phases in breast cancer trajectory: re‐examination of factor structure of the Mini‐MAC and its correlation with distress

Authors: Wei-Ting, Wang; Pei-Chiung, Tu; Tse-Jia, Liu; Dah-Cherng, Yeh; Wen-Yau, Hsu;

Mental adjustment at different phases in breast cancer trajectory: re‐examination of factor structure of the Mini‐MAC and its correlation with distress

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe aim of this study is twofold. First, it aims to determine the factor structure of the Mini‐Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini‐MAC) Scale by using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to compare the three‐factor, four‐factor, and five‐factor structures among 340 Taiwanese breast cancer patients. Second, it aims to test the difference in the correlations of coping strategies and the outcome measures between two populations: one‐month newly diagnosed and five‐year long‐term survival patients.MethodsTwo samples, composed of 142 newly diagnosed and 198 long‐term survival breast cancer patients, were recruited. Cancer‐specific coping and distress were assessed via the Mini‐MAC Scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), respectively.ResultsThe CFA confirmed Watson's original five‐factor structure fit the data best. The correlation difference between the two samples lies in the fighting spirit (FS), which correlated negatively with distress among the newly diagnosed sample but had no correlation among the long‐term survivors. Moreover, fatalism (FA) was found to correlate positively with distress.ConclusionsThe five‐factor structure represents a more psychometrically sound measure of psychological adjustment in the current data set. The findings also support the argument that the relationships between coping and distress vary, to some degree, at different phases in the cancer trajectory. FS is only a positive predictor of psychological adjustment among newly diagnosed patients. Because of the exclusion of two items, FA showed a positive correlation with distress, a result that contradicts previous findings. Further theoretical and practical implications for FS and FA are discussed.Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Country
Taiwan
Keywords

Asian Continental Ancestry Group, Questionnaires, Adult, long term survival, Adolescent, distress syndrome, Taiwan, Breast Neoplasms, Anxiety, Stress, Young Adult, breast cancer, Asian People, Surveys and Questionnaires, Adaptation, Psychological, internal consistency, Humans, controlled study, human, mini Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale, named inventories, Survivors, Adaptation, outcome assessment, Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, adult, article, questionnaires and rating scales, Statistical, Middle Aged, major clinical study, aged, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, female, Treatment Outcome, Socioeconomic Factors, Psychological, coping behavior, Female, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Mental Status Schedule, Factor Analysis, Stress, Psychological, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    28
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
28
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!