
doi: 10.1002/pon.1631
pmid: 19823972
AbstractObjectives: Emotional burden on oncology care workers is considerable. These workers develop confidential relationship with the patient through interpersonal communication, which entails managing their own emotions as well as the emotions displayed by their patients, and it involves a great deal of emotion work. The objectives in our study were to assess the prevalence of burnout and emotional dissonance and to investigate the interrelationship among burnout, emotion work and coping in oncology care.Method: A cross‐sectional survey with anonymous questionnaires was conducted among oncology health care workers (N = 48) and non‐oncology health care workers (N = 151).Results: The comparison revealed differences primarily in emotion work and coping. Emotional dissonance as stress factor was more prevalent among oncology health care workers. Caregivers dealing with cancer patients felt that they have to display negative emotions less frequently, yet at the same time they frequently have to show understanding and express sympathy to the patient. When certain coping strategies were examined, we found that humour as potential resource in coping is used less frequently among oncology health care workers.Conclusion: In order to devise effective interventions to oncology personnel, we need to focus on the interaction between the carer and the cancer patient and have more evidence on emotional dissonance in oncology staff. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Adult, Male, Patient Care Team, Hungary, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Emotions, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Oncology Service, Hospital, Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Female, Burnout, Professional
Adult, Male, Patient Care Team, Hungary, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Emotions, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Oncology Service, Hospital, Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Female, Burnout, Professional
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 40 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
