
Abstract The number of small proteins (SPs) encoded in the Escherichia coli genome is unknown, as current bioinformatics and biochemical techniques make short gene and small protein identification challenging. One method of small protein identification involves adding an epitope tag to the 3′ end of a short open reading frame (sORF) on the chromosome, with synthesis confirmed by immunoblot assays. In this study, this strategy was used to identify new E. coli small proteins, tagging 80 sORFs in the E. coli genome, and assayed for protein synthesis. The selected sORFs represent diverse sequence characteristics, including degrees of sORF conservation, predicted transmembrane domains, sORF direction with respect to flanking genes, ribosome binding site (RBS) prediction, and ribosome profiling results. Of 80 sORFs, 36 resulted in encoded synthesized proteins—a 45% success rate. Modeling of detected versus non‐detected small proteins analysis showed predictions based on RBS prediction, transcription data, and ribosome profiling had statistically‐significant correlation with protein synthesis; however, there was no correlation between current sORF annotation and protein synthesis. These results suggest substantial numbers of small proteins remain undiscovered in E. coli , and existing bioinformatics techniques must continue to improve to facilitate identification.
Open Reading Frames, Escherichia coli Proteins, Protein Biosynthesis, Escherichia coli, Computational Biology, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Ribosomes, Research Articles, Genome, Bacterial
Open Reading Frames, Escherichia coli Proteins, Protein Biosynthesis, Escherichia coli, Computational Biology, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Ribosomes, Research Articles, Genome, Bacterial
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 56 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
