
pmid: 21328539
AbstractUnderstanding the fragmentation process in MS/MS experiments is vital when trying to validate the results of such experiments, and one way of improving our understanding is to analyze existing data. We here present our findings from an analysis of a large and diverse data set of MS/MS‐based peptide identifications, in which each peptide has been identified from multiple spectra, recorded on two commonly used types of electrospray instruments. By analyzing these data we were able to study fragmentation variability on three levels: (i) variation in detection rates and intensities for fragment ions from the same peptide sequence measured multiple times on a single instrument; (ii) consistency of rank‐based fragmentation patterns; and (iii) a set of general observations on fragment ion occurrence in MS/MS experiments, regardless of sequence. Our results confirm that substantial variation can be found at all levels, even when high‐quality identifications are used and the experimental conditions as well as the peptide sequences are kept constant. Finally, we discuss the observed variability in light of ongoing efforts to create spectral libraries and predictive software for target selection in targeted proteomics.
Proteomics, Analysis of Variance, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Molecular Sequence Data, Peptide Fragments, Peptide Library, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Amino Acid Sequence, Databases, Protein, Software
Proteomics, Analysis of Variance, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Molecular Sequence Data, Peptide Fragments, Peptide Library, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Amino Acid Sequence, Databases, Protein, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
