
pmid: 17994627
AbstractMS combined with database searching has become the preferred method for identifying proteins present in cell or tissue samples. The technique enables us to execute large‐scale proteome analyses of species whose genomes have already been sequenced. Searching mass spectrometric data against protein databases composed of annotated genes has been widely conducted. However, there are some issues with this technique; wrong annotations in protein databases cause deterioration in the accuracy of protein identification, and only proteins that have already been annotated can be identified. We propose a new framework that can detect correct ORFs by integrating an MS/MS proteomic data mapping and a knowledge‐based system regarding the translation initiation sites. This technique can provide correction of predicted coding sequences, together with the possibility of identifying novel genes. We have developed a computational system; it should first conduct the probabilistic peptide‐matching against all possible translational frames using MS/MS data, then search for discriminative DNA patterns around the detected peptides, and lastly integrate the facts using empirical knowledge stored in knowledge bases to obtain correct ORFs. We used photosynthetic bacteria Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 as a sample prokaryote, resulting in the finding of 14 N‐terminus annotation errors and several new candidate genes.
Proteomics, Light, Synechocystis, Chromosome Mapping, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Mass Spectrometry, Bacterial Proteins, Prokaryotic Cells, Genes, Bacterial, Databases, Genetic, Peptides
Proteomics, Light, Synechocystis, Chromosome Mapping, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Mass Spectrometry, Bacterial Proteins, Prokaryotic Cells, Genes, Bacterial, Databases, Genetic, Peptides
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
