
doi: 10.1002/pmh.1510
pmid: 34002530
AbstractAimNo measure has formally been developed to assess the published ICD‐11 model of Personality Disorder (PD) severity. We therefore set out to develop and evaluate the 14‐item Personality Disorder Severity ICD‐11 (PDS‐ICD‐11) scale.MethodA representative U.S. community sample (N = 428; 50.9% women) and a New Zealand mental health sample (N = 87; 61.5% women) completed the PDS‐ICD‐11 scale along with a series of established PD and impairment measures.ResultsItem response theory supported the unidimensionality of PDS‐ICD‐11 (median item loading of 0.68) and indicated that a PDS‐ICD‐11 score of 17.5 may serve as a benchmark for pronounced dysfunction. Correlation and regression analyses supported both criterion validity and incremental validity in predicting impairment and PD symptoms. The PDS‐ICD‐11 was particularly associated with measures of Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS), Global PD severity, and Borderline PD symptom score. A comparison between clinical individuals diagnosed with an ICD‐11 PD vs. no PD supported diagnostic validity.ConclusionThis initial construction study suggests that the PDS‐ICD‐11 constitutes a promising instrument that provides a quick impression of the severity of personality dysfunction according to the official ICD‐11 PD guidelines. Clearly, more research is needed to corroborate its validity and utility. The PDS‐ICD‐11 scale is provided as online supporting information.
Male, Personality Inventory, Borderline Personality Disorder, International Classification of Diseases, Humans, Female, Personality Disorders, Personality
Male, Personality Inventory, Borderline Personality Disorder, International Classification of Diseases, Humans, Female, Personality Disorders, Personality
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 101 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
