Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Pregnancyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Pregnancy
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Treatment patterns and costs among hospital births with abnormal postpartum uterine bleeding and postpartum hemorrhage in the United States (2016–2022)

Authors: Kara M. Rood; Candice Yong; Patricia I. Carney; Brian Seal; Seungyoung Hwang; Krishna Tangirala; Roy M. Brooks;

Treatment patterns and costs among hospital births with abnormal postpartum uterine bleeding and postpartum hemorrhage in the United States (2016–2022)

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPostpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality globally, and PPH rates in the United States are increasing. The current study describes treatment patterns and healthcare costs in abnormal postpartum uterine bleeding and PPH in the United States.MethodUtilizing data from the US Premier Hospital Database from January 2016 to March 2022, this study investigated treatment patterns for second‐line uterotonics and tranexamic acid (TXA), as well as the incidence of PPH and associated severe maternal morbidity (SMM) events, treatment patterns, and total healthcare costs. The analysis included 5,345,753 inpatient admissions for deliveries, identified PPH through ICD‐10 CM codes or administration of specified uterotonic medications beyond oxytocin.ResultsA total of 787,964 (14.7%) individuals had PPH and/or received second‐line uterotonics beyond oxytocin (methylergonovine maleate, carboprost, misoprostol) and/or TXA. Rates of second‐line uterotonics/TXA and/or PPH increased from 12.1% in 2016 to 19.7% in 2022. Methylergonovine (51.9%) and misoprostol (47.0%) were the most used uterotonics. The mean ± SD SMM and nontransfusion SMM comorbidity scores were 6.8 ± 8.9 and 8.5 ± 12.4, respectively, and included common maternal risk factors such as advanced maternal age, anemia, prior cesarean delivery, and hypertensive disorders. Economic burden was high, particularly for individuals who required hysterectomy (vaginal births: $29,375 and cesarean births: $34,103), received uterine balloon tamponade (UBT; vaginal births: $12,605 and cesarean births: $20,188), and/or were treated with 3 or more second‐line uterotonics/TXA (vaginal births: $10,084 and cesarean births: $16,288). Intensive care unit admissions and hysterectomies were more common in the 3–4 uterotonics/TXA groups (4.4% and 2.2%) and among those who received UBT (9.4% and 4.4%) than those who received < 3 uterotonics/TXA.ConclusionUsing second‐line uterotonic/TXA use and PPH diagnosis codes, the observed rate of abnormal postpartum bleeding was higher than previously reported and associated with significant clinical and economic burden. Total costs increased with greater use of uterotonics/TXA, especially in cases involving UBT or SMM such as hysterectomy. Higher treatment intensity likely reflects escalation in response to more severe clinical presentations. These findings highlight the need for appropriate intervention, better treatment options, and preventive strategies to manage abnormal postpartum uterine bleeding and PPH.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold