
ABSTRACTThis study examined the growth parameters of both glyphosate‐susceptible and glyphosate‐resistant biotypes of Amaranthus palmeri, designated as GA2005 and GA2017, respectively. A two‐year microplot field study was conducted to assess their growth characteristics. Scheduled destructive harvests on named harvest days (HD) were conducted to collect measurements for further calculation of net assimilation rate (NAR; g m−2 day−1), specific leaf area (SLA), leaf weight ratio (LWR), stem‐to‐leaf ratio (SLR), leaf area index (LAI), leaf area ratio (LAR; cm2 g−1), leaf area duration (LAD; days), relative growth rate (RGR; g.g−1 day−1) and plant volume (m3). In addition, stem diameter, number of leaves, and Chlorophyll content (μmol m2) were determined. The main objective was to identify growth parameters that differentiate biotypes along the plant life cycle. While certain growth parameters showed no variation among biotypes, differences in leaf area index (LAI) over HD and chlorophyll content and leaf area duration (LAD) were observed as the main effects. Glyphosate‐resistant biotypes exhibited higher LAD and chlorophyll content, potentially conferring a competitive advantage, especially in heavily used glyphosate environments. The study highlights the complexity of intraspecific genetic differentiation, adaptation, and environmental factors affecting A. palmeri. It may offer insights into biotype distinction and resistance spread while advancing our comprehension of species adaptation and growth strategies for enhanced control.
leaf area index, leaf area ratio, leaf weight ratio, Botany, net assimilation rate, Environmental sciences, chlorophyll content, QK1-989, leaf area duration, GE1-350, Research Article
leaf area index, leaf area ratio, leaf weight ratio, Botany, net assimilation rate, Environmental sciences, chlorophyll content, QK1-989, leaf area duration, GE1-350, Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
