
doi: 10.1002/pds.619
pmid: 11760487
AbstractPurposeTo examine the fatalities reported to the federally administered Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a passive surveillance system, in its first 7 years.MethodsThe working data set included variables such as demographic information, dates of vaccination, adverse event onset and death, vaccines administered, and vaccination facility data. Frequencies for these data and state reporting rates were calculated.ResultsA total of 1266 fatalities were reported to VAERS during July 1990 through June 1997. The number of death reports peaked in 1992–1993 and then declined. The overall median age of cases was 0.4 years, with a range of 1 day to 104 years. Nearly half of the deaths were attributed to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).ConclusionsThe trend of decreasing numbers of deaths reported to VAERS since 1992–1993 follows that observed for SIDS overall for the US general population following implementation of the ‘Back to Sleep’ program. These data may support findings of past controlled studies showing that the association between infant vaccination and SIDS is coincidental and not causal. VAERS reports of death after vaccination may be stimulated by the temporal association, rather than by any causal relationship. Published in 2001 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, United States Food and Drug Administration, Vaccination, Age Factors, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Middle Aged, United States, Sex Factors, Child, Preschool, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Humans, Female, Health Facilities, Child, Sudden Infant Death, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, United States Food and Drug Administration, Vaccination, Age Factors, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Middle Aged, United States, Sex Factors, Child, Preschool, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Humans, Female, Health Facilities, Child, Sudden Infant Death, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
